President Joe Biden is facing criticism from a conservative perspective regarding his handling of recent events on the world stage. The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorist organization damaged the Belize-flagged cargo ship M/V Rubymar near the Arabian Peninsula, marking an escalation in their aggressive actions. The ship was hit by anti-ship ballistic missiles, prompting the crew to abandon it. This event signifies a new level of danger as it is the first time a Houthi attack has forced a crew to abandon a ship due to damage.
The attacks are seen as a failure on Biden’s part to protect American interests and deter aggression from U.S. enemies. The Houthi group, with assistance from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), is accused of launching missile strikes on multiple cargo ships and claiming to shoot down a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone. The IRGC is considered a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, and its involvement in supporting the Houthi attacks is a source of concern.
Despite these escalations, the conservative perspective argues that Biden has been hesitant to use the necessary force to prevent and deter such acts of aggression, fearing confrontation with Iran. The attacks are viewed as a consequence of Biden’s reluctance to take decisive action against Iran-backed groups. The conservative viewpoint criticizes Biden’s overall foreign policy, citing instances such as the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, perceived weakness in deterring Russia, and failure to respond forcefully to attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East.
In summary, the conservative perspective emphasizes Biden’s perceived shortcomings on the world stage, particularly in dealing with the Houthi attacks and broader issues of foreign policy, which may impact his standing as he heads into the 2024 presidential election.
