Since the tumultuous 2020 election and the subsequent expansion of mail-in balloting, the mainstream media, known for its alignment with the Democratic Party, has vigorously defended the notion that this unsupervised system is infallible and devoid of fraud. Those expressing concerns about the inherent risks of mass mail-in voting are often dismissed as conspiracy theorists or labeled as “election deniers.”
However, in a surprising turn of events, several established publications have recently published articles subtly acknowledging that the process may not be as secure or dependable as previously claimed.
Last week, NBC News, widely regarded as a mouthpiece for the Democrats, released an article highlighting the potential impact of postal delivery delays on mail-in voting during the upcoming 2024 election. The concerns were echoed by Rep. Sylvia Garcia, a Texas Democrat, who warned about the ramifications of ongoing postal issues on the fall elections.
But postal delays are just one aspect undermining the media’s narrative of the infallibility of mail-in voting. CBS News conducted an investigation revealing the escalating problem of mail theft, titled: “Amid surging mail theft, post offices failing to secure universal keys.” The report highlighted a significant increase in mail theft complaints, raising serious questions about the security of the postal system.
CBS found that the U.S. Postal Service has neglected to secure millions of universal “arrow keys” used to access bulk mailboxes, leading to rampant theft across the country. Despite the growing concerns and documented cases of assault and robbery against postal workers, the media’s portrayal of mail-in voting as flawless remains inconsistent with reality.
The discrepancy between the media’s narrative and the actual challenges facing mail-in voting is striking. Despite assurances from Democrats and their media allies, mail-in balloting is susceptible to errors and misconduct, as acknowledged by the Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency (CISA) before the 2020 election. Instead of addressing these issues transparently, CISA covertly flagged online posts discussing mail-in voting problems for censorship by Big Tech companies.
The prevalence of unsupervised mail-in voting provides opportunities for left-wing groups to exploit the system, enabling them to harvest low-effort votes and gain an advantage for Democratic candidates. As concerns about the integrity of mail-in voting persist, it is evident that the media’s portrayal of its safety and reliability is at odds with the growing evidence of its vulnerabilities and shortcomings.
